Exercise Therapy in Oncology­the Impact on Quality of Life and Side Effects.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis and treatment of cancer are highly stressful. Exercise therapy is often used to mitigate the adverse effects of treatment. But how good is the evidence base, and what has changed in recent years? In this narrative review, we present the current data and what it implies for the care of adults with cancer. METHODS: This review is based on data from meta-analyses and systematic reviews concerning 16 relevant clinical endpoints (outcomes) of exercise therapy for cancer patients RESULTS: The literature evaluated for this paper reveals that targeted exercise therapy is feasible and safe under appropriate supervision. It is highly effective for improving eight of the sixteen endpoints (anxiety, depression, fatigue, quality of life, physical function, secondary lymphedema after breast cancer, urinary incontinence, post-mastectomy pain syndrome in breast cancer) and may also have a beneficial effect on sleep quality, cardiotoxicity, and cognitive function. Less conclusive studies are currently available with respect to chemotherapy-induced polyneuropathy, nausea/vomiting, and bone health. There is currently insufficient data to suggest any benefit with respect to sexual function and risk factors for falling. CONCLUSION: The data situation shows that exercise therapy for cancer patients is safe and has manifold effects on selected clinically relevant parameters. Further studies should be performed regarding the possible utility of exercise therapy against treatment-related side effects for which the evidence is currently insufficient. On the basis of the currently available and already existing recommendations, quality-assured exercise therapy can be recommended to cancer patients suffering from a wide range of neoplastic conditions.

A Multimodal Lifestyle Psychosocial Survivorship Program in Young Cancer Survivors: The CARE for CAYA Program-A Randomized Clinical Trial Embedded in a Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Importance: There is a lack of trials examining the effect of counseling interventions for child, adolescent, and younger adult (CAYA) cancer survivors. Objective: To assess lifestyle habits and the psychosocial situation of CAYAs to determine the efficacy of needs-based interventions in the CARE for CAYA program (CFC-P). Design, Setting, and Participants: The CFC-P was conducted as a multicenter program in 14 German outpatient clinics, mainly university cancer centers. Recruitment began January 1, 2018; a randomized clinical trial was conducted until July 15, 2019; and intervention was continued as a longitudinal cohort study until March 31, 2021. Data preparation was conducted from April 1, 2021, and analysis was conducted from August 14, 2021, to May 31, 2022. Herein, predefined confirmatory analyses pertain to the RCT and descriptive results relate to the overall longitudinal study. Data analysis was based on the full analysis set, which is as close as possible to the intention-to-treat principle. Intervention: A comprehensive assessment determined needs in physical activity, nutrition and psychooncology. Those with high needs participated in 1 to 3 modules. In the RCT, the IG received 5 counseling sessions plus newsletters, while the control group CG received 1 counseling session. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the change in the rate of CAYAs with high needs at 52 weeks. Secondary outcomes were feasibility, modular-specific end points, satisfaction, quality of life, and fatigue. Results: Of 1502 approached CAYAs aged 15 to 39 years, 692 declined participation. Another 22 CAYAs were excluded, resulting in 788 participants. In the randomized clinical trial, 359 CAYAs were randomized (intervention group [IG], n = 183; control group [CG], n = 176), and 274 were followed up. In the RCT, the median age was 25.0 (IQR, 19.9-32.2) years; 226 were female (63.0%) and 133 male (37.0%). After 52 weeks, 120 CAYAs (87.0%) in the IG and 115 (86.5%) in the CG still had a high need in at least 1 module (odds ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.51-2.11; P = .91). Both groups reported reduced needs, improved quality of life, reduced fatigue, and high satisfaction with the CFC-P. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, the implementation of a lifestyle program in this cohort was deemed necessary, despite not meeting the primary outcome. The interventions did not alter the rate of high needs. The results may provide guidance for the development of multimodal interventions in the follow-up care of CAYAs. Trial Registration: German Clinical Trial Register: DRKS00012504.

Effects of Exercise Training on Patient-Specific Outcomes in Pancreatic Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: International guidelines have already highlighted the beneficial effects of exercise in common cancer entities. However, specific recommendations for pancreatic cancer are still missing. This scoping review aimed to evaluate the impact of exercise training on patient-specific outcomes in pancreatic cancer patients. METHODS: A literature search was undertaken using PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published before August 2023 with structured exercise interventions during or after pancreatic cancer treatment. RESULTS: Seven articles that prescribed home-based or supervised exercise with aerobic or resistance training or both were reviewed. The results indicate that exercise is feasible and safe in pancreatic cancer patients. Furthermore, exercise was associated with improved quality of life, cancer-related fatigue, and muscle strength. Concerning other outcomes, heterogeneous results were reported. We identified a lack of evidence, particularly for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. CONCLUSION: Exercise interventions in pancreatic cancer patients are feasible and can lead to improved quality of life, cancer-related fatigue, and muscle strength. However, further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to clarify the potential of exercise in pancreatic cancer, in particular for advanced stages.

Supportive Care in Oncology-From Physical Activity to Nutrition.

The diagnosis and treatment of cancer are associated with impairment at the physical and at psychological level. In addition, side effects are a potentially treatment-limiting factor that may necessitate dose reduction, delay, or even discontinuation of therapy, with negative consequences for outcome and mean survival. Numerous studies have shown that physical activity and sports and exercise therapy programs are not only practicable but also recommendable for oncologic patients during the acute phase and in the aftercare. Furthermore, nutrition plays an important role in all stages of tumor therapy. A timely integration of a nutrition therapy and physical activity in the form of physiotherapy and sports therapy serves to prevent and reduce treatment-associated side effects. Evidence-based recommendations on cancer prevention through nutrition therapy, physical activity, and sports and exercise therapy should be integrated into treatment plans for oncology patients as well as in health care services for the general population. Individual counselling by trained nutrition and exercise specialists may be advisable to receive concrete recommendations on the respective tumor entity or specific side effects. This mini review is based on a selective literature search in the PubMed database and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials on the subjects of healthy diet and physical activity in primary prevention and follow-up about cancer.

Effects of a structured counselling-based intervention to improve physical activity behaviour of adolescents and young adult cancer survivors - the randomized phase II Motivate AYA - MAYA trial.

OBJECTIVE: To explore whether a structured counselling-based intervention increases vigorous physical activity behaviour of adolescent and young adult cancer survivors. DESIGN: Randomized controlled phase II trial. SETTING: University Cancer Center Hamburg, Germany. SUBJECTS: Eighty-nine participants (mean age 24.1 ± 6.3) were randomized to control (n = 44) or intervention group (n = 45). INTERVENTIONS: The intervention group was consulted about physical activity behaviour via interview (week 0), and telephone counselling (weeks 1, 3 and 12). The control group only received general physical activity guidelines for cancer survivors (week 0). MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome was the rate of participants with ⩾9 metabolic equivalent (MET)-hours per week of vigorous activity post-intervention, measured with the International Physical Activity Questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included assessing physical activity behaviour (e.g. amount and type of physical activity) and quality of life. Assessments were completed in weeks 0 (baseline), 12 (post-intervention) and 52 (follow-up). RESULTS: Sixty-nine participants completed the post-intervention- and 47 the follow-up-assessment. The rate of participants performing vigorous physical activity increased from baseline to post-intervention for both without differing significantly (P = 0.541). Both increased their total metabolic equivalent from baseline to post-intervention (intervention group from 55.2 ± 43.7 to 61.7 ± 29.4, control group from 75.3 ± 81.4 to 88.3 ± 80.2). At follow-up the intervention group (73.7 ± 80.2) was more active than baseline when compared to the control group (78.5 ± 50.0). CONCLUSIONS: A structured counselling-based physical activity intervention did not significantly impact the level of vigorous physical activity behaviour in adolescent and young adult cancer survivors.

Individual specialist physical activity assessment and intervention in advanced cancer patients on a palliative care ward; the 3STEPS-study.

The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the feasibility and outcome of an activity assessment and intervention on a specialized palliative care ward. All patients admitted between May 2017 and April 2018 were screened for basic assessment (Step 1). Whenever possible the Tinetti-mobility test (TT) was performed by a physiotherapist. A comparison between physician and nurse-led assessment and patient report was performed (Step 2), followed by a low-intensity individually adapted activity intervention (Step 3). Physical function and global quality of life was measured at intervention start and at discharge. Home care training adherence was controlled by phone call. In total, 437 patients were admitted in one year. In 248 patients, a basic assessment was done of which 131 performed a TT. In this group, median age was 63 years. Types of cancer were gastrointestinal (n=39), lung (n=27), urogenital (n=20), non-cancer (n=26) and other (n=26). Median length of stay was 13 days. Correlations between assessment methods were low to moderate, the highest between the TT and the nurse led assessment. Six patients started the intervention. Four patients completed the intervention, of which two continued with the home based training. In all four patients, an improvement in outcomes was measured. In conclusion in around a quarter of patients on a palliative care ward a TT could be performed. The TT correlated to most with nurse led mobility assessment. In the few accrued patients, the activity intervention showed an effect.

Tipping point: When patients stop eating and drinking in the last phase of their life.

BACKGROUND: Eating and drinking are essential also in social life. Nutrition and hydration (N&H) at end of life are often a source of discussion and distress. Stopping eating and drinking is a defining element of the dying phase, however, this time point is not well defined. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to investigate whether such a time point can be detected, whether there are specific characteristics associated. METHODS: The time point when patients stopped oral intake was analyzed in relation to time until death on a specialist palliative care ward (sPCW) of a tertiary comprehensive cancer center. This "tipping point" (TP) was defined as the time point when total food intake fell below 25% of normal solid intake (TP-S) and "tipping point fluid" (TP-F) when fluid intake fell below 500 ml/day (oral/intravenous/subcutaneous). Demographic and medical data, the N&H-module in the electronic patient management system and the daily multiprofessional treatment notes at TP (±3 days) were analyzed in all patients cared on the sPCW between 1/15 and 9/17. RESULTS: In these 32 months, of 1194 treated patients 683 (57%) died on the ward. A TP-S was identified in 291 patients prior to dying on the ward (43%) with a median time of six days from to TP-S death. In 75% of these patients, TP-S occurred within two weeks prior to death (range: 0-5 weeks). A TP-F was detected in 202 patients (30%) with a median TP-F-time of two days prior to death. In 75% of these patients, the TP-F was within three days prior to death (range: 0-14 days). The cancer entities in patients in whom TPs could be detected were heterogeneous. No specific disease-related or sociodemographic characteristics for patients with TPs could be determined. In the daily treatment notes, oral and swallowing problems, taste alterations and discussions about stopping artificial nutrition were mentioned. CONCLUSION: In less than half of dying patients a definitive TP could be detected. In these patients, TP-S occurred within two weeks and TP-F within few days before death. No specific characteristics of patients with TPs could be observed. This indicates the individual nature of the trajectory at end of life.

Exercise training in patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer undergoing palliative chemotherapy: a pilot study.

PURPOSE: This pilot study aimed to investigate the feasibility of two different training programs in patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer undergoing palliative chemotherapy. Potential effects of training programs on the patients' quality of life, physical performance, physical activity in daily living, and biological parameters were exploratorily evaluated. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to a resistance (RET) and aerobic exercise training group (AET). Both underwent supervised training sessions twice a week for 12 weeks. RET was performed at 60-80% of the one-repetition maximum and consisted of 2-3 sets of 15-25 repetitions. The AET group performed endurance training at 60-80% of their predetermined pulse rate (for 10 to 30 min). RESULTS: A total of 26 gastrointestinal cancer patients could be randomized. Twenty-one patients completed the 12 weeks of intervention. The median adherence rate to exercise training of all 26 patients was 65%, while in patients who were able to complete 12 weeks, adherence was 75%. The fatigue score of all patients decreased from 66 to 43 post-intervention. Sleeping duration increased in both groups and muscular strength increased in the RET group. A higher number of steps in daily living was associated with higher levels of physical and social functioning as well as lower scores for pain and fatigue. CONCLUSION: RET and AET are feasible in gastrointestinal cancer patients undergoing palliative chemotherapy. Both training programs seem to improve cancer-related symptoms as well as the patient's physical activities of daily living.

Effects of exercise training programs on physical performance and quality of life in patients with metastatic lung cancer undergoing palliative chemotherapy--a study protocol.

PURPOSE: The aims of the study protocol are to investigate different adapted physical training programs in patients with advanced lung cancer undergoing palliative chemo- or radiotherapy and to evaluate their effects on physical performance, quality of life, symptom burden, and efficacy of oncologic treatment. METHODS: Patients will be randomized into three study arms: interventional group 1 performing aerobic exercise, interventional group 2 performing resistance training, and a control group without specific physical training. Interventional training will be performed for 12 weeks consisting of two supervised and one self-instructed training sessions per week each. Respiratory therapy over 12 weeks is provided in all three study arms as an established supportive therapy in lung cancer patients. Primary efficacy endpoint is physical performance measured by peak oxygen consumption (VO(2)peak). Secondary efficacy endpoints include additional parameters of physical performance (resistance, lung function, perceived exertion, level of physical activity and IPAQ-questionnaire), health-related quality of life (EORTC QLQ C30-questionnaire), disease and treatment related symptoms (Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale), biologic parameter (e.g. body composition, blood values of immune system, chronic inflammation, glucose and lipid metabolisms), and parameter of efficacy of oncologic treatment. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will offer an overview over possible effects of specific training interventions on health related quality of life, physical and psychological symptoms, and on the efficacy of oncologic treatment. The primary aim of this study is to detect adapted intervention programs for metastatic lung cancer undergoing palliative chemotherapy.

Physical exercise and therapy in terminally ill cancer patients: a retrospective feasibility analysis.

PURPOSE: Physical exercise (PE) and/or therapy (PT) shows beneficial effects in advanced cancer patients and is increasingly implemented in hospice and palliative care, although systematic data are rare. This retrospective study systematically evaluated the feasibility of PE/PT in terminally ill cancer patients and of different modalities in correspondence to socio-demographic and disease- and care-related aspects. METHODS: All consecutive terminally ill cancer patients treated in a palliative care inpatient ward during a 3.5-year period were included. The modalities were chosen according to the therapists' and patients' appraisal of current performance status and symptoms. RESULTS: PE/PT were offered to 572 terminally ill cancer patients, whereof 528 patients (92 %) were able to perform at least one PE/PT unit (average 4.2 units/patient). The most frequently feasible modalities were physical exercises in 50 %, relaxation therapy in 22 %, breathing training in 10 %, and positioning and lymph edema treatment in 6 % each. Physical exercise and positioning treatment were performed significantly more often in older patients (p=0.009 and p=0.022, respectively), while relaxation (p=0.05) and lymph edema treatment (p=0.001) were used more frequently in younger. Breathing training was most frequently performed in head and neck cancer (p=0.002) and lung cancer (p=0.026), positioning treatment in brain tumor patients (p=0.021), and lymph edema treatment in sarcoma patients (p=0.012). CONCLUSIONS: PE/PT were feasible in >90 % of terminally ill cancer patients to whom PE/PT had been offered. Physical exercises, relaxation therapy, and breathing training were the most frequently applicable methods. Prospective trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy of specific PE/PT programs in terminally ill cancer patients.

Multimodal exercise training during myeloablative chemotherapy: a prospective randomized pilot trial.

PURPOSE: Cancer and its treatment-related side effects induce loss of physical performance. This study evaluated the effects of multimodal aerobic and strength exercises on physical performance in hospitalized cancer patients while receiving myeloablative chemotherapy. METHODS: In this prospective pilot study, 48 evaluable patients were randomly assigned to a training (TG, n = 24) or control (CG, n = 24) group. The TG performed an individually supervised exercise program five times a week with ergometer training and strength exercises for 20 min each during the hospitalization period for chemotherapy. The CG received standard physiotherapy. Physical performance was evaluated using spiroergometry, lung function, and muscle strength testing. Treatment-related side effects were assessed by daily interviews, quality of life by EORTC-QLQ-C30, and fatigue using the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) questionnaire. RESULTS: Physical performance significantly increased in the TG (8.96 ± 24 W) and decreased in the CG (-7.24 ± 20 W, p = 0.02). At 2-mmol/ml blood lactate concentration, the TG achieved significantly increased oxygen consumption (p = 0.03) and expiratory minute ventilation (p = 0.04) compared to the CG. Furthermore, physical functioning increased significantly in the TG (p = 0.04). Patients in the TG required less antiemetics (p = 0.01) and experienced significantly less fatigue (p = 0.04), although MFIS analysis was not able to detect this beneficial effect. Patients of the CG displayed higher impairments of cognitive (p = 0.02) and psychosocial function (p = 0.03) after chemotherapy. No adverse events due to the study intervention were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Multimodal exercise has beneficial effects on physical performance, physical functioning, and treatment-related symptoms even during myeloablative chemotherapy. We suggest an enhanced physical activity intervention program during hospitalization of cancer patients.

Physical activity, quality of life, and the interest in physical exercise programs in patients undergoing palliative chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Quality of life is of major importance in patients with advanced cancers undergoing palliative chemotherapy. In contrast to the number of studies on physical activity in patients with curable malignancies, data on patients undergoing palliative chemotherapy are scarce. METHODS: A total of 53 patients receiving palliative chemotherapy on an outpatient basis were interviewed using three standardized questionnaires within a time period of 4 weeks (Questionnaire for Measurement of Habitual Physical Activity, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C13 questionnaire, International Physical Activity questionnaire), and a questionnaire regarding patients' acceptance of a potential physical training program. RESULTS: Thirty-six percent of the patients still performed self-instructed physical activities during palliative chemotherapy. Patients showed significantly higher values in the "leisure time index" during their malignancy than before (p < 0.01). Significantly positive correlations were found between "work index" and quality of life (p = 0.004), "work index" and physical function (p = 0.02), and "hours of physical activity per week" and quality of life (p < 0.05). A negative correlation was found between "work index" and fatigue (p < 0.05). Quality of life scores were significantly higher in patients with sportive activities ≥ 9 metabolic equivalent (MET) h/week than in patients with <9 MET h/weeks (p < 0.01). Sixty percent of patients indicated that they would be willing to participate in an individually adapted activity training program. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing palliative chemotherapy, a statistically significant positive correlation between physical activity and quality of life could be demonstrated. About two thirds of critically ill patients are interested in participating in training programs.